


BUDU is a tech subscription service: instead of buying a phone or laptop outright, a user subscribes and pays a fixed monthly fee to use the device. For the market, this was a new model — people were used to buying or taking devices in installments. The task was not just to drive traffic, but to validate real demand and the economics of the model.
Launch the website and test real market interest in the model. Get the first purchases, understand acquisition economics, and build a stable flow of conversions. Determine which channel — Meta or Google — provides better purchase economics.
This was not just an ad launch — it was a business-hypothesis test: is the market ready to pay for gadget subscriptions?
We entered the project as a test of a new business model. First, we:
We clearly fixed what counts as a purchase and how it should be measured. Only after that did we scale.
Meta became the main test channel:
In communication, the offer was simple and clear: this is not a loan and not installments — it is a subscription with a fixed monthly payment.
Meta result: 299 purchases, CPO $2.86, spend $961.85.
Google was connected for scale. It generated 543 conversions and around 49% of total traffic, proving demand and helping expand reach.
Clear analytics before scaling — without it, testing the business hypothesis would have been impossible.
Optimization for real purchases, not traffic — every conversion was counted and influenced the algorithm’s learning.
Simple communication of a new model: “not a loan, not installments — a subscription with a fixed payment.”
Testing channels and comparing economics — Meta won on CPO, Google provided scale.
Decision-making based on data — the business hypothesis was confirmed with numbers rather than intuition.

